I kept 3 other people in a small room talking about my ideas for nearly an hour. That was nice. It was nice affirmation of the work I had done.
We talked about the process, where the project had been and where it is going. We also brought up holes in the argument, but that doesn't worry me. For the scope of my project, things had to be left out. The trick was I could address those concerns in discussion.
Now I have to write the paper for Indian Children's lit.
Blergh.
I'm gonna take a break for drinks and appetizers at Houlihan's first.
Showing posts with label masters defense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label masters defense. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Masters Defense...dun, dun dun! And the Paper I did not write.
So I'm trying to prepare to defend my masters project today.
One thing I may have a hard time with is Paradise Lost. It's a long and complicated text, and I can't keep all the angels and demons/devils straight, especially because I don't think Philip Pullman created exact parallels in His Dark Materials. I don't think Paradise Lost is that relevant to my project persay, but Dr. Smith is a hardcore Milton fan. Also, a lot of our attitudes about the Fall of Adam and Eve come from the widely read Paradise Lost as much as they do from the bible, so actually it is relevant. Since there is no time to read Paradise Lost for a third time in my life, I am sparknoting this morning, but I must say, Sparknotes offers some biased evaluation on the text, though they make attempts to be fair.
I'm also worried that no one will ask me about rhetorical theory in my defense since it's not relevant to the lit and tech writing people on my committee. I'm fairly sure they will ask me what I would do with the project in the future. I think I'll talk about its potential for book length development, but emphasize that while a full book focusing on the rhetoric of His Dark Materials is possible and would be interesting, my focus would be on developing the theory and using more example texts to illustrate the potential of the theory. That way I can draw in more Burke and what I did with Abby's paper last spring.
I'm nervous.
I also still need to write the paper that was due yesterday but that I had the wrong date for. I'm a putz, and grad school is melting my brain, but I think I have mulled through the topic enough to crank out a paper. It's funny how after completing my masters project a 15 page, well-supported paper seems like nothing.
I'm going to talk about the Indian nationalist movement to unify India through mapping the Mother Goddess over the nation of India and how that made India into a specifically Hindi nation, creating oppression for Muslim Indians and others.
Then I'm going to talk about how The Smile of Vanuvati traces the Mother Goddess back through history in the form of the parallels of land and an iconic doll in order to connect the Mother Goddess to a more open history of India, which is more inclusive of Muslims and other historically present groups.
The Smile of Vanuvati is set in the state of Gujarat, which has seen intense violence between Hindi and Muslin groups even in recent years, so the book is a timely response to the tensions there.
Okay, back to defense mode. I need to shower and get dressed.
One thing I may have a hard time with is Paradise Lost. It's a long and complicated text, and I can't keep all the angels and demons/devils straight, especially because I don't think Philip Pullman created exact parallels in His Dark Materials. I don't think Paradise Lost is that relevant to my project persay, but Dr. Smith is a hardcore Milton fan. Also, a lot of our attitudes about the Fall of Adam and Eve come from the widely read Paradise Lost as much as they do from the bible, so actually it is relevant. Since there is no time to read Paradise Lost for a third time in my life, I am sparknoting this morning, but I must say, Sparknotes offers some biased evaluation on the text, though they make attempts to be fair.
I'm also worried that no one will ask me about rhetorical theory in my defense since it's not relevant to the lit and tech writing people on my committee. I'm fairly sure they will ask me what I would do with the project in the future. I think I'll talk about its potential for book length development, but emphasize that while a full book focusing on the rhetoric of His Dark Materials is possible and would be interesting, my focus would be on developing the theory and using more example texts to illustrate the potential of the theory. That way I can draw in more Burke and what I did with Abby's paper last spring.
I'm nervous.
I also still need to write the paper that was due yesterday but that I had the wrong date for. I'm a putz, and grad school is melting my brain, but I think I have mulled through the topic enough to crank out a paper. It's funny how after completing my masters project a 15 page, well-supported paper seems like nothing.
I'm going to talk about the Indian nationalist movement to unify India through mapping the Mother Goddess over the nation of India and how that made India into a specifically Hindi nation, creating oppression for Muslim Indians and others.
Then I'm going to talk about how The Smile of Vanuvati traces the Mother Goddess back through history in the form of the parallels of land and an iconic doll in order to connect the Mother Goddess to a more open history of India, which is more inclusive of Muslims and other historically present groups.
The Smile of Vanuvati is set in the state of Gujarat, which has seen intense violence between Hindi and Muslin groups even in recent years, so the book is a timely response to the tensions there.
Okay, back to defense mode. I need to shower and get dressed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)